Beazer has finally received a notice of default on their senior notes, to be considered an event of default in 60 days if not cured. This came about as a result of their failure o file their quarterly report with the SEC, due to an internal investigation of their ex-CFO's accounting practices. I have serious doubts about this company as an ongoing concern. Centex has opened a new warehouse credit line to fund their mortgages since their special purpose funding vehicle can no longer roll over asset backed paper in the commercial paper market, and more importantly (and an assumption on my part) are unable to reliably stand as an investment grade counterparty in their swap agreements. This new credit line is much more expensive to Centex, only funds conforming style mortgages (meaning only a mere portion of the volume of their previous deals get done), and commits them to repurchase the loans back from the bank, on demand. So basically, this is only short term financing that cannot be held passed a specific time period.
7-Sep-2007
Other Events
On August 31, 2007, CTX Mortgage Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("CTX Mortgage") and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Centex Corporation, a Nevada corporation ("Centex"), entered into a committed bank mortgage warehouse credit facility (the "Warehouse Facility") with JPMorgan Chase Bank (collectively with other banks that may become parties thereto as buyers, the "Banks") in order to provide financing for mortgage loans originated by CTX Mortgage in the ordinary course of its mortgage finance business. The Warehouse Facility provides for, among other things, the sale by CTX Mortgage to the Banks, on a revolving basis, of mortgage loans with associated borrowings of up to an aggregate of $450 million. Such loans will generally be repurchased by CTX Mortgage on a specified date or on demand and will then be resold by CTX Mortgage to third parties. The facility has an accordion feature under which, subject to the successful syndication of additional committed capacity, the Banks may extend up to an additional $550 million of borrowings on mortgage loans on the same terms. Mortgage loans eligible for sale by CTX Mortgage under the Warehouse Facility are conforming loans, FHA/VA-eligible loans and jumbo loans meeting conforming underwriting guidelines except as to the size of the loan. For financial accounting purposes, borrowings under the Warehouse Facility will constitute short-term debt obligations of CTX Mortgage, and will be consolidated on Centex's financial statements. The Warehouse Facility renews and increases a similar $200 million warehouse credit facility that expired in August 2007. The Warehouse Facility contains various affirmative and negative covenants, representations, warranties and events of default or termination of a type generally customary for facilities of this type. In addition to the new Warehouse Facility, CTX Mortgage has a $200 million committed warehouse financing facility with another lender.
Until recently, CTX Mortgage funded the origination of mortgage loans predominantly through the sale of loans to Harwood Street Funding I, LLC ("HSF-I"), a special purpose entity. Under the HSF-I facility, HSF-I generally obtained the funds needed to purchase eligible mortgage loans from CTX Mortgage by issuing short-term securities. In mid-2007, the credit markets experienced disruption and a curtailment of liquidity. For a discussion of certain market conditions affecting our ability to finance our mortgage operations, please see the risk factors contained in our periodic reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q. As a result of the more recent market conditions affecting mortgage-backed loans, which worsened significantly in August 2007, beginning in August 2007, CTX Mortgage realized that it may not be able to rely on asset-backed funding vehicles, such as HSF-I, for its primary mortgage funding needs. In order to diversify its capital sources and provide additional liquidity, CTX Mortgage has elected to increase the amount of available warehouse credit lines by entering into the renewed Warehouse Facility. CTX Mortgage may seek to enter into additional mortgage warehouse facilities with other lenders. CTX Mortgage reduced the maximum amount of debt that HSF-I can issue from $3.0 billion to $1.5 billion. Further use of HSF-I will depend on market conditions.
"Until recently, CTX Mortgage funded the origination of mortgage loans predominantly through the sale of loans to Harwood Street Funding I, LLC ("HSF-I"), a special purpose entity. Under the HSF-I facility, HSF-I generally obtained the funds needed to purchase eligible mortgage loans from CTX Mortgage by issuing short-term securities."
Isn't this was Enron was doing? All the "action" was going on in the SPE(s)?
Any idea which of ABX/CDX series holds the Harwood Street Funding loan pools?
I like your new blog. :-)
Posted by: Chuck | September 11, 2007 at 01:53 PM
Well, nearly all of the public homebuilders use special purpose entities for funding, or at least they did until investors stopped buying thier paper, and their credit ratings dropped below investment grade.
Like Enron, they did it to keep it off balance sheet. They also have a LOT of their risk hidden in joint ventures that are also held off balance sheet, but may be referred to as minority interests in their reporting. These JVs contain big losses (my good guess) due to land devaluation, goodwill impairment (read as paid too much) and who the hell knows what else because... well it's off balance sheet!!! Don't sleep on how much money can be lost in off balance sheet JVs. Ask RDN and MGIC, who together lost $1 billion in less than a quarter.
As for which series holds the pools, I have no idea, but my best guess would be the ones losing the most money.
Posted by: Reggie | September 11, 2007 at 02:41 PM
Well, nearly all of the public homebuilders use special purpose entities for funding, or at least they did until investors stopped buying thier paper, and their credit ratings dropped below investment grade.
Like Enron, they did it to keep it off balance sheet. They also have a LOT of their risk hidden in joint ventures that are also held off balance sheet, but may be referred to as minority interests in their reporting. These JVs contain big losses (my good guess) due to land devaluation, goodwill impairment (read as paid too much) and who the hell knows what else because... well it's off balance sheet!!! Don't sleep on how much money can be lost in off balance sheet JVs. Ask RDN and MGIC, who together lost $1 billion in less than a quarter.
As for which series holds the pools, I have no idea, but my best guess would be the ones losing the most money.
Posted by: Reggie | September 11, 2007 at 02:41 PM
the information of this post is very relevant
for what i am looking for, thank you so much for sharing this one
Posted by: ferragamo shoes | March 14, 2011 at 07:32 PM
I have serious doubts about this company as an ongoing concern.
Posted by: quail hill homes for sale | July 20, 2011 at 08:01 PM
I have serious doubts about this company as an ongoing concern.
Posted by: turtle ridge homes | July 22, 2011 at 05:32 PM