« A note on mortgages, overly optimistic recovery rates and recent events... | Main | Follow up to the Ambac Analysis »

December 03, 2007

Lennar's 50% haircut does not make them look any better

Now that I have had a chance to actually go through what Lennar's transaction is about, I have a lot more to say. Here goes...

From WSJ.com:

Lennar Corp. has sold about 11,000 home sites to a venture mostly owned by the real-estate arm of Morgan Stanley for $525 million, a large land sale that signals that investors have begun to pounce on bargain deals.

The sites -- in 32 communities in areas hit hard by the housing downturn -- were valued on Lennar's books at $1.3 billion as of Sept. 30. The low price the venture paid is a vivid sign of how land values have plummeted with the downturn, precipitated by defaults on subprime mortgages and tightening credit that have led to a broader slowdown in sales.

I could have sworn Lennar's CEO was just in the news saying they were going to mothball properties (sit on them) until the market turns. Maybe I was imagining it. My Voodoo post alleged Lennar was borderline insolvent. This recent news item simply reinforces that, and brings them closer to that insolvency. The assets that I used for that calculation have now been devalued by 50%, although some of it has been replaced by cash which Lennar is in desperate need of. Hence, they have now just about arrived at full balance sheet insolvency, yet have pushed cash flow insolvency back another $525 million. I got the 50% number in lieu of the 60% number published in the media because Lennar recieved 20% equity ownership in the venture that they sold the company to, and retained 50% voting rights and rights of first refusal for reacquisition at market prices, which should have an optionality value of about 3%.

BUTTTTT!!! This is the kicker, now we can mark their current inventory holdings to market, at about 50% of what was reported in their financial statements (see the links below for detail on how to see through this). Not to pick on Lennar, the other builders are holding the same inventory, depending on geograpic location, of course. Running this through my fully consolidated Lennar model (the one built for the Voodoo post that consolidated a lot of the hidden off balance sheet debt and assets), let's see what we get...

First off, we apply our market mark of 50% to raw land, work in process, an investment in unconsolidated entities (we'll put a much smaller mark on the finished sites, but valuation looks bearish in many areas). We also put the mark on goodwill (which in this situation is really Bull@#$@), and we'll leave the other assets category alone for the most part to give them the benefit of the doubt. Financial assets (mortgages, Lennar did $10.5 billion last year) in the categories of "held for sale", "held for investment" and "held to maturity" (notice how this number increased, denoting a problem selling them) will get the same haircut E-trade got, which admittedely is a gross generalization, but if anything is conservative since the E-trade MBS assets were likely far superior to Lennar's (who assuredely got quite aggressive pushing mortgages to move their difficult inventory) with an average FICO of 720 and 50% of them rated AA or higher.

The result??? For Q307 we have $6,277,501,000 in total assets and $5,315,821,000 in total liabilities. The net equity divided by total shares outstanding gives us a book value per share of $6 (hint: the builders have been trading at a deep discount to book value - Shhh! Keep this on the down low). For the next fiscal quarter, using the model's projections, you get negative equity, or insolvency as I predicted in the voodoo post. The good (okay, the better) news is that Lennar has pushed off cash flow insolvency for a year and marginally improved their Z scores with this deal. According to the new cash infused Z scores, they have bought themselves an extra year before bankruptcy. Since it appears many home builder investors either don't know about Lennar's off balance sheet shenanigan's and inventory valuation games or don't care, they may actually get away with trading at $15 to $20 per share while actually being insolvent. Hey, Enron got away with it at $90 per share, at least for a while.

For those who haven't been following Lennar in my blog, here is a quick update on their situation in full and explicit detail (for those that thought the Voodoo post was too bearish, recent events bring much more to light):

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54ed5c056883300e54f9552d28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lennar's 50% haircut does not make them look any better:

Comments

Hi Reggie,

I've been following your blog for a while now and I would have to say you provide the most unbiased and straight forward research in the industry. Congratulations.

How long do you think Lennar is going to be trading in the $15-$20 range? If memory serves me right Enron imploded far faster than the home builders with with similar shenanigans. I don't quite understand the market euphoria behind Lennar's prospects of late. It seems to absolutely make no sense.

Regards,

Arun

Thanks, and what the hell are you doing up at 5:46 AM? :-)

Enron was probably playing their games for quite some time before they got busted. If you have ever watched the movie "Usual Suspects", the character Virgil quoted, "The biggest accomplishment the devil ever made was to convince the world that he didn't exist".

I see Lennar falling at least to the level of their fully consolidated economic book level, which I made an off the cuff calculated guess at in the post above. As for when, who knows... The market is currently not trading off of fundamentals, or we would be in the midst of a massive correction right now and staring at a full fledged bear market! Patience and awareness are still virtues though, the last few major market corrections and bear markets were presaged by similar activity

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search

  •  

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

December 2007

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31